On Saturday, August 27th, 2011, sections of NYC were evacuated for the first time in history, and the largest public transportation system in the country was shut down due to Hurricane Irene. With conditions deteriorating, Mayor Bloomberg instructed New Yorkers to stay home for our own safety and so that emergency vehicles could easily navigate the streets. Downpours occurred throughout the day.

In spite of all of the above and the law which states that carriage operators cannot work during “ice, heavy rain or other slippery conditions,” dozens of horse-drawn carriage operators were working until at least 4:45 p.m., many hours after the City was virtually shut down. They then had to make the long, difficult trip through the wet streets of midtown back to the “stables.”

As usual, the ASPCA, which collects an untold amount of money from donors in the name of helping the carriage horses, allowed the carriage drivers to leave the stables in the morning and to work all day in the wet streets in spite of the law and in spite of pleas from animal advocates.

The horse-drawn carriage industry is enabled by the ASPCA, which claims to support a ban, and empowered by NYC Council Speaker Christine Quinn, who has blocked all efforts to take these horses out of midtown, killing bills in committee before they see the light of day. [Read more →]

BLINDERS is featured on CNN Headline News

Carriage horses working during "weather emergency"

February 1, 2011

Pamela Corey DVM
Director of Equine Veterinary Services
ASPCA
424 East 92nd Street
New York, NY 10128

Dear Dr. Corey:

In response to your message below, perhaps the following reasons explain why people around the country complain to the ASPCA about your handling of the carriage horses:

1. The ASPCA is silent when your voice is needed the most.  At the Mayor’s public hearing on the carriage operator rate hike bill, Bloomberg stated, “The ASPCA has convinced me that the horses are treated humanely.”  Why weren’t you at that critical hearing in front of the cameras to correct him and to testify in support of a ban?  He could have vetoed the bill. (see video below).
2. The ASPCA didn’t show up to NYC Council Member T0ny Avella’s  press conference announcing the bill to ban horse-drawn carriages.  Why?  Because you were absent in the press at that critical moment, NYers were left with the misimpression that it was just a bunch of animal rights extremists who support of a ban.
3. The ASPCA pulled out all the stops to preserve your industry oversight when a bill was being considered to take it away from you.  Why don’t you put that energy into fighting for a ban?
4. The ASPCA wasted hundreds of thousands of dollars of your donors’ contributions on a lobbying firm that you ultimately fired instead of just using your board of directors, influence in the City, celebrity spokespeople and PR machine to publicly demand a ban.
5. The ASPCA has fostered an environment where carriage operators are comfortable defying your authority and the law.   What, if anything, are the consequences for them?
6. The ASPCA allows the industry to state to the press that the ASPCA has never issued a cruelty summons.   Could that possibly be true?
7. The ASPCA continues to give the public the impression that you’re monitoring the industry and protecting the horses when, in fact, your presence is sporadic at best and your absence is palpable on weekends, when the horses are working the most.
8. The ASPCA has publicly thanked Christine Quinn for pushing two marginal bills through the City Council at the expense of the carriage ban and other meaningful bills. [Read more →]

Protest against Christine Quinn

On January 18, 2011, City Council Speaker Christine Quinn pushed a bill through the City Council that makes it illegal for NYers to tie up their dogs more than 3 hours. On its surface, this law sounds like a godsend for dogs because chaining is unspeakably cruel. But if you scratch the surface, you’ll see why the only one who truly benefits from this new law is Quinn herself and why this bill hurts our effort to ban horse-drawn carriages.

If dogs are, in fact, chained to backyard fences in NYC, they won’t benefit from this law because it is unenforceable, as Quinn admits during her press conference about the bill.

Because chaining is not a major problem in NYC compared to other forms of animal abuse, local animal advocates have not made this issue a legislative priority. Instead, they have worked tirelessly for years on meaningful bills that would, in fact, reduce animal suffering in the City — bills that Quinn has blocked in committee.

So, if the tethering law won’t actually help animals and is not a legislative priority for the community, then why did Quinn push this bill through the Council at lightning speed? [Read more →]